[schooltool-dev] wfmc roadmap?

Tom Hoffman tom.hoffman at gmail.com
Mon Mar 12 01:25:36 EDT 2007


Hi Kit,

I don't have any deep insight into who is working on wfmc, but can say
I consider it to have been a bad bet on my part.  I feel like I wasted
a substantial amount of developer time chasing wfmc.  I just tend to
geek out a bit on standards and try to use them whenever the
opportunity presents, but in this case, I don't see that there was any
real upside.

--Tom

On 3/12/07, Kit BLAKE <kitblake at infrae.com> wrote:
> Hi SchoolTool people,
> Infrae is participating in a tender offer (in Belgium) which could
> provide substantial funding for workflow framework development in Zope3.
> We are currently evaluating directions.
>
> I know there is wfmc code in SchoolTool, but I don't have enough
> technical depth to judge the approach. One of the partners in the tender
> sent the following message. Does anyone have information or thinking
> that would be good for us to hear?
>
> > Do you know if there exists a roadmap for the wfmc part of Zope3?
> >
> > Do you know  if functionalities like
> >         -'activities status reporting'
> >         -UI for management
> >         -time able activity (deadline, ...)
> > are planned?
> >
> > Do you thing that the Zope community is interested by
>  > developments/extensions around wfmc?
> >
> > Who is responsible for the wfmc implementation?
> >
> > In short: Is it a good choice to wager on wfmc as workflow engine?
> > (durability, support, ..)
>
> Thanks,
> Kit
>
> --
> Kit BLAKE · Infrae · http://infrae.com/ + 31 10 243 7051
> Hoevestraat 10 · 3033 GC · Rotterdam + The Netherlands
> Contact = http://xri.net/=kitblake
> _______________________________________________
> Schooltool-dev mailing list
> Schooltool-dev at schooltool.org
> http://lists.schooltool.org/mailman/listinfo/schooltool-dev
>


More information about the Schooltool-dev mailing list