[schooltool-dev] monday dev meeting...

[Tom Hoffman]

Well, the conclusion was to create a big stinking deb which contains
in itself all the necessary dependencies, which is appropriate for
internal use with CanDo but not something that would actually be used
in Debian or Ubuntu proper.  So we won't actually be backporting all
the little separate dependency packages well be creating for public
release in Gutsy.

--Tom

On 5/14/07, Matthew Gallagher <mattva01 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Well now that I've read the chat for this morning, I think debs are
> definitely the way to go.
> I think it is probably easier to create a backport then to manage the
> upgrade from feisty to gutsy with eggs.
>
>
>  On 5/14/07, Tom Hoffman <tom.hoffman at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 5/14/07, Jason Straw <lists at misato.us> wrote:
> > > In all reality, wedding ourselves to Ubuntu/Debian is not a problem, if
> > > someone wants it for rpm based distros they can figure out how to get it
> > > compiled and packaged.  As an upstream provider, our job should be to
> > > put out a tar.gz and maybe a binary package for the distro we care most
> > > about (and given Mark Shuttleworth's involvement in SchoolTool, this
> > > isn't even a question...)
> >
> > For this question in particular, bear in mind that I'm worried about
> > what will work best for CanDo's *internal* use -- distributing
> > directly to the schools they work with.
> >
> > --Tom
> >
>
>
>
> --
> -Matthew Gallagher
> _______________________________________________
> Schooltool-dev mailing list
> Schooltool-dev at schooltool.org
> http://lists.schooltool.org/mailman/listinfo/schooltool-dev
>
>