[schooltool-dev] monday dev meeting...

[Matthew Gallagher]

That sounds reasonable.

On 5/14/07, Jason Straw <lists at misato.us> wrote:
>
> With the caveat that there be an upgrade path to Gutsy's public release.
>
>
>
> Tom Hoffman wrote:
> > Well, the conclusion was to create a big stinking deb which contains
> > in itself all the necessary dependencies, which is appropriate for
> > internal use with CanDo but not something that would actually be used
> > in Debian or Ubuntu proper.  So we won't actually be backporting all
> > the little separate dependency packages well be creating for public
> > release in Gutsy.
> >
> > --Tom
> >
> > On 5/14/07, Matthew Gallagher <mattva01 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Well now that I've read the chat for this morning, I think debs are
> >> definitely the way to go.
> >> I think it is probably easier to create a backport then to manage the
> >> upgrade from feisty to gutsy with eggs.
> >>
> >>
> >>  On 5/14/07, Tom Hoffman <tom.hoffman at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On 5/14/07, Jason Straw <lists at misato.us> wrote:
> >> > > In all reality, wedding ourselves to Ubuntu/Debian is not a
> >> problem, if
> >> > > someone wants it for rpm based distros they can figure out how to
> >> get it
> >> > > compiled and packaged.  As an upstream provider, our job should
> >> be to
> >> > > put out a tar.gz and maybe a binary package for the distro we
> >> care most
> >> > > about (and given Mark Shuttleworth's involvement in SchoolTool,
> this
> >> > > isn't even a question...)
> >> >
> >> > For this question in particular, bear in mind that I'm worried about
> >> > what will work best for CanDo's *internal* use -- distributing
> >> > directly to the schools they work with.
> >> >
> >> > --Tom
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> -Matthew Gallagher
>
>


-- =

-Matthew Gallagher
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.schooltool.org/pipermail/schooltool-dev/attachments/20070=
514/bb82f18d/attachment.htm